Choose Global loyalty rather than Iranian principles.

The mere fact that your article reporting the award of a Nobel Peace Prize
to an "IRANIAN activist" was the clue which led me to try to point out that
the award was an error of illegitimate moral validity.
And a further study of the contents of the article seemed to
indicate that your Editor should either have condemned the award or have
contended that it was a mistake to describe Miss Ebadi as an "IRANIAN
activist"
The point here is that a NOBEL Peace Prize Winner should be moved
by interest in WORLD improvement rather than any kind if nationalist zeal
such as IRANIAN activism,
So let us discard the part-world [i.e. nationalist zeal] to make it
quite clear that Miss Ebadi was being moved by global morality at all
times.
instead of the existing Iranian motivation used at the beginning of your
article,
This could have beeb justified quite easily by citing her REFUSAL
to wear a -- which was a proof that she is not an Iranian nationalist.
We must keep in mind the FACT that global reasoning cannot be
backed by NATIONALIST [Iranian or otherwise] part-world proposals of
morality.
If I had my way I would welcome her as an ANTI-IRANIAN loyalist so
that the acceptable advocacy she teaches c an be fully in keeping with the
worldism we associate with the NOBEL PEACE MOVEMENT.
Long Live the ideal of a Nobel-motivated universe for the abolition
of internationalist rivalry with armies.
A world of sovereign nations is unacceptable. Please ACCEPT THIS
RULING.